1967 Cadillac Brougham vs. 2002 Honda Accord
To start off, 2002 Honda Accord is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Cadillac Brougham (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 2002 Honda Accord. (161 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Cadillac Brougham should accelerate faster than 2002 Honda Accord. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 585 kg more than 2002 Honda Accord. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Honda Accord is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Cadillac Brougham. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Honda Accord will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Cadillac Brougham | 2002 Honda Accord | |
Make | Cadillac | Honda |
Model | Brougham | Accord |
Year Released | 1967 | 2002 |
Body Type | Sedan | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 2354 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 161 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2145 kg | 1560 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 4760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 2640 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 60 L |