1967 Cadillac Brougham vs. 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo
To start off, 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 975 kg more than 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo.
Because 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Cadillac Brougham. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Cadillac Brougham | 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo | |
Make | Cadillac | Mitsubishi |
Model | Brougham | Dingo |
Year Released | 1967 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 1300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2145 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 3900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 2450 mm |