1967 Cadillac Brougham vs. 2002 Suzuki F1
To start off, 2002 Suzuki F1 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Cadillac Brougham (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 141 more horse power than 2002 Suzuki F1. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Cadillac Brougham should accelerate faster than 2002 Suzuki F1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 675 kg more than 2002 Suzuki F1. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Cadillac Brougham | 2002 Suzuki F1 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Suzuki |
| Model | Brougham | F1 |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 7029 cc | 1995 cc |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 67 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 2145 kg | 1470 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 2210 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 45 L |
