1967 Cadillac Brougham vs. 2006 Lincoln Mark LT
To start off, 2006 Lincoln Mark LT is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Lincoln Mark LT (300 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 1967 Cadillac Brougham. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Lincoln Mark LT should accelerate faster than 1967 Cadillac Brougham. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Lincoln Mark LT weights approximately 291 kg more than 1967 Cadillac Brougham. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Lincoln Mark LT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Cadillac Brougham. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Lincoln Mark LT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Cadillac Brougham | 2006 Lincoln Mark LT | |
Make | Cadillac | Lincoln |
Model | Brougham | Mark LT |
Year Released | 1967 | 2006 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 5406 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 300 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2145 kg | 2436 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 5690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1870 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 3520 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 114 L |