1967 Cadillac Brougham vs. 2009 Chevrolet Impala
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Impala is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Impala (211 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1967 Cadillac Brougham. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Impala should accelerate faster than 1967 Cadillac Brougham. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 1070 kg more than 2009 Chevrolet Impala.
Because 1967 Cadillac Brougham is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Cadillac Brougham. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Impala, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Cadillac Brougham | 2009 Chevrolet Impala | |
Make | Cadillac | Chevrolet |
Model | Brougham | Impala |
Year Released | 1967 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 211 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2145 kg | 1075 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 5100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 2810 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 64 L |