1967 Cadillac Brougham vs. 2010 Ford F-250
To start off, 2010 Ford F-250 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford F-250 (300 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 1967 Cadillac Brougham. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford F-250 should accelerate faster than 1967 Cadillac Brougham. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford F-250 weights approximately 660 kg more than 1967 Cadillac Brougham. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Cadillac Brougham | 2010 Ford F-250 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | Brougham | F-250 |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7029 cc | 5400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 300 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 2145 kg | 2805 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 6253 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 2029 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1961 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 3967 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 115 L |
