1967 Cadillac Brougham vs. 2011 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2011 Nissan Micra is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Cadillac Brougham (208 HP) has 129 more horse power than 2011 Nissan Micra. (79 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Cadillac Brougham should accelerate faster than 2011 Nissan Micra.
Because 1967 Cadillac Brougham is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Cadillac Brougham. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Micra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Cadillac Brougham | 2011 Nissan Micra | |
| Make | Cadillac | Nissan |
| Model | Brougham | Micra |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7029 cc | 1200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 79 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1666 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1514 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 2449 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 46 L |
