1967 Cadillac Brougham vs. 2013 Volvo C30
To start off, 2013 Volvo C30 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Volvo C30 (224 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1967 Cadillac Brougham. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Volvo C30 should accelerate faster than 1967 Cadillac Brougham. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 685 kg more than 2013 Volvo C30.
Because 1967 Cadillac Brougham is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Cadillac Brougham. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Volvo C30, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Cadillac Brougham | 2013 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
Model | Brougham | C30 |
Year Released | 1967 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 224 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2145 kg | 1460 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 4266 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 2039 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1447 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 2640 mm |