1967 Cadillac Calais vs. 1953 Jeep CJ
To start off, 1967 Cadillac Calais is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Cadillac Calais (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 149 more horse power than 1953 Jeep CJ. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 1953 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 874 kg more than 1953 Jeep CJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Cadillac Calais | 1953 Jeep CJ | |
| Make | Cadillac | Jeep |
| Model | Calais | CJ |
| Year Released | 1967 | 1953 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7029 cc | 2199 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 59 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1990 kg | 1116 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 3130 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1460 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2040 mm |
