1967 Cadillac Calais vs. 1983 Lincoln Continental
To start off, 1983 Lincoln Continental is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Cadillac Calais would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Cadillac Calais (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 1983 Lincoln Continental. (114 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 1983 Lincoln Continental. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 304 kg more than 1983 Lincoln Continental. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Cadillac Calais | 1983 Lincoln Continental | |
Make | Cadillac | Lincoln |
Model | Calais | Continental |
Year Released | 1967 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 2443 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1990 kg | 1686 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 5120 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2760 mm |