1967 Cadillac Calais vs. 1984 Holden Camira
To start off, 1984 Holden Camira is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Cadillac Calais would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Cadillac Calais (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 122 more horse power than 1984 Holden Camira. (86 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 1984 Holden Camira. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 950 kg more than 1984 Holden Camira. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Cadillac Calais | 1984 Holden Camira | |
| Make | Cadillac | Holden |
| Model | Calais | Camira |
| Year Released | 1967 | 1984 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7029 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 86 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1990 kg | 1040 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4410 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2580 mm |
