1967 Cadillac Calais vs. 1995 Mercury Villager
To start off, 1995 Mercury Villager is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Cadillac Calais would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Cadillac Calais (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1995 Mercury Villager. (149 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 1995 Mercury Villager. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 190 kg more than 1995 Mercury Villager. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Cadillac Calais | 1995 Mercury Villager | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mercury |
| Model | Calais | Villager |
| Year Released | 1967 | 1995 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7029 cc | 2960 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 149 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1990 kg | 1800 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4950 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1910 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2860 mm |
