1967 Cadillac Calais vs. 1996 Mazda 121
To start off, 1996 Mazda 121 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Cadillac Calais would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Cadillac Calais (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 134 more horse power than 1996 Mazda 121. (74 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 1996 Mazda 121. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 999 kg more than 1996 Mazda 121. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Cadillac Calais | 1996 Mazda 121 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
| Model | Calais | 121 |
| Year Released | 1967 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7029 cc | 1242 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1990 kg | 991 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 3820 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2460 mm |
