1967 Cadillac Calais vs. 2003 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2003 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Cadillac Calais would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mazda RX-8 (228 HP @ 8200 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1967 Cadillac Calais. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1967 Cadillac Calais. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 565 kg more than 2003 Mazda RX-8.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Cadillac Calais | 2003 Mazda RX-8 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
| Model | Calais | RX-8 |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7029 cc | 1308 cc |
| Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 228 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 8200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1990 kg | 1425 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4440 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2710 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 61 L |
