1967 Cadillac Calais vs. 2003 Opel Omega
To start off, 2003 Opel Omega is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Cadillac Calais would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Cadillac Calais (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 2003 Opel Omega. (143 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 2003 Opel Omega. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 257 kg more than 2003 Opel Omega. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Cadillac Calais | 2003 Opel Omega | |
| Make | Cadillac | Opel |
| Model | Calais | Omega |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7029 cc | 2198 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 143 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1990 kg | 1733 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4830 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2850 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 75 L |
