1967 Cadillac Calais vs. 2004 Volvo S60
To start off, 2004 Volvo S60 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Cadillac Calais would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Cadillac Calais (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 2004 Volvo S60. (160 HP @ 5900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 2004 Volvo S60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 489 kg more than 2004 Volvo S60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Cadillac Calais | 2004 Volvo S60 | |
Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
Model | Calais | S60 |
Year Released | 1967 | 2004 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 2435 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5900 RPM |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1990 kg | 1501 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 70 L |