1967 Cadillac Calais vs. 2009 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Cadillac Calais would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (273 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 1967 Cadillac Calais. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1967 Cadillac Calais. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 661 kg more than 2009 Mazda CX-9.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Cadillac Calais | 2009 Mazda CX-9 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
| Model | Calais | CX-9 |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7029 cc | 3726 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 273 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1990 kg | 1329 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 5080 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1940 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1730 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2880 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 76 L |
