1967 Cadillac Calais vs. 2012 Mazda 3
To start off, 2012 Mazda 3 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Cadillac Calais would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Cadillac Calais (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 2012 Mazda 3. (167 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 2012 Mazda 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 607 kg more than 2012 Mazda 3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Cadillac Calais | 2012 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | Calais | 3 |
Year Released | 1967 | 2012 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 167 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1990 kg | 1383 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4506 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1755 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1471 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 60 L |