1967 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1959 DAF 600
To start off, 1967 Cadillac DeVille is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 DAF 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 DAF 600 would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Cadillac DeVille (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 189 more horse power than 1959 DAF 600. (19 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1959 DAF 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 1365 kg more than 1959 DAF 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1959 DAF 600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 DAF 600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1967 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Cadillac DeVille | 1959 DAF 600 | |
| Make | Cadillac | DAF |
| Model | DeVille | 600 |
| Year Released | 1967 | 1959 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7029 cc | 590 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 19 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1995 kg | 630 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 3610 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1450 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2060 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 28 L |
