1967 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1969 Triumph 2000

To start off, 1969 Triumph 2000 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Cadillac DeVille (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 119 more horse power than 1969 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1969 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 855 kg more than 1969 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1969 Triumph 2000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Triumph 2000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1967 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1967 Cadillac DeVille 1969 Triumph 2000
Make Cadillac Triumph
Model DeVille 2000
Year Released 1967 1969
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 7029 cc 1998 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 208 HP 89 HP
Engine RPM 4600 RPM 5000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 2025 kg 1170 kg
Vehicle Length 5700 mm 4640 mm
Vehicle Width 2030 mm 1660 mm
Vehicle Height 1370 mm 1430 mm
Wheelbase Size 3300 mm 2700 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 82 L 64 L