1967 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1995 Mazda 626
To start off, 1995 Mazda 626 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Cadillac DeVille (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 1995 Mazda 626. (118 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1995 Mazda 626. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 815 kg more than 1995 Mazda 626. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Cadillac DeVille | 1995 Mazda 626 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
| Model | DeVille | 626 |
| Year Released | 1967 | 1995 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7029 cc | 1996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2025 kg | 1210 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2620 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 60 L |
