1967 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1995 Pininfarina Argento
To start off, 1995 Pininfarina Argento is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Cadillac DeVille (208 HP) has 18 more horse power than 1995 Pininfarina Argento. (190 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1995 Pininfarina Argento.
Because 1995 Pininfarina Argento is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 Pininfarina Argento. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1967 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Cadillac DeVille | 1995 Pininfarina Argento | |
| Make | Cadillac | Pininfarina |
| Model | DeVille | Argento |
| Year Released | 1967 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7029 cc | 2501 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 190 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
