1967 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1996 Renault Clio
To start off, 1996 Renault Clio is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Renault Clio (250 HP) has 42 more horse power than 1967 Cadillac DeVille. (208 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1967 Cadillac DeVille. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 345 kg more than 1996 Renault Clio.
Because 1996 Renault Clio is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Renault Clio. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1967 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Cadillac DeVille | 1996 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Cadillac | Renault |
| Model | DeVille | Clio |
| Year Released | 1967 | 1996 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 7029 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 250 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1995 kg | 1650 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1640 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2490 mm |
