1967 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2002 Kia Optima

To start off, 2002 Kia Optima is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Cadillac DeVille (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 2002 Kia Optima. (138 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 2002 Kia Optima. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 614 kg more than 2002 Kia Optima. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1967 Cadillac DeVille is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Cadillac DeVille. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Kia Optima, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1967 Cadillac DeVille 2002 Kia Optima
Make Cadillac Kia
Model DeVille Optima
Year Released 1967 2002
Body Type Convertible Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 7029 cc 2497 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 208 HP 138 HP
Engine RPM 4600 RPM 4000 RPM
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 2046 kg 1432 kg
Vehicle Length 5700 mm 4740 mm
Vehicle Width 2030 mm 1830 mm
Vehicle Height 1370 mm 1420 mm
Wheelbase Size 3300 mm 2710 mm