1967 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2003 Caterham 7
To start off, 2003 Caterham 7 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Cadillac DeVille (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 2003 Caterham 7. (160 HP @ 7500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 2003 Caterham 7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 1495 kg more than 2003 Caterham 7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Caterham 7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Caterham 7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1967 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Cadillac DeVille | 2003 Caterham 7 | |
Make | Cadillac | Caterham |
Model | DeVille | 7 |
Year Released | 1967 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 1794 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 7500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1995 kg | 500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 3110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2230 mm |