1967 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2003 MG TF
To start off, 2003 MG TF is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,952 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Cadillac DeVille (288 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 130 more horse power than 2003 MG TF. (158 HP @ 6900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 2003 MG TF. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 810 kg more than 2003 MG TF. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Cadillac DeVille | 2003 MG TF | |
| Make | Cadillac | MG |
| Model | DeVille | TF |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 6952 cc | 1796 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 288 HP | 158 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6900 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 1190 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 3950 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1270 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2380 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 50 L |
