1967 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2003 Volvo V50
To start off, 2003 Volvo V50 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Cadillac DeVille (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 2003 Volvo V50. (139 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 2003 Volvo V50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 530 kg more than 2003 Volvo V50. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Cadillac DeVille | 2003 Volvo V50 | |
Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
Model | DeVille | V50 |
Year Released | 1967 | 2003 |
Body Type | Sedan | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 2442 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 139 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1995 kg | 1465 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 62 L |