1967 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2006 Lincoln LS
To start off, 2006 Lincoln LS is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,952 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Cadillac DeVille (288 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 2006 Lincoln LS. (280 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 2006 Lincoln LS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 289 kg more than 2006 Lincoln LS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Cadillac DeVille | 2006 Lincoln LS | |
| Make | Cadillac | Lincoln |
| Model | DeVille | LS |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6952 cc | 3933 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 288 HP | 280 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 1711 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4940 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1870 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2910 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 68 L |
