1967 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2010 Ford E-150
To start off, 2010 Ford E-150 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford E-150 (265 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 1967 Cadillac DeVille. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-150 should accelerate faster than 1967 Cadillac DeVille. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 196 kg more than 2010 Ford E-150.
Because 1967 Cadillac DeVille is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Cadillac DeVille. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-150, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Cadillac DeVille | 2010 Ford E-150 | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | DeVille | E-150 |
Year Released | 1967 | 2010 |
Body Type | Convertible | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 265 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 2046 kg | 1850 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4717 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1925 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1702 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2824 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 72 L |