1967 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2011 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2011 Toyota Tundra is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Toyota Tundra (381 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 173 more horse power than 1967 Cadillac DeVille. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1967 Cadillac DeVille. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 311 kg more than 2011 Toyota Tundra.
Because 2011 Toyota Tundra is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Toyota Tundra. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1967 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Cadillac DeVille | 2011 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
Model | DeVille | Tundra |
Year Released | 1967 | 2011 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 5663 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 381 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1995 kg | 1684 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 5820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1930 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 3710 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 100 L |