1967 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2013 Toyota Sequoia
To start off, 2013 Toyota Sequoia is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,952 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Toyota Sequoia (376 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 88 more horse power than 1967 Cadillac DeVille. (288 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Sequoia should accelerate faster than 1967 Cadillac DeVille. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Toyota Sequoia weights approximately 714 kg more than 1967 Cadillac DeVille. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Cadillac DeVille | 2013 Toyota Sequoia | |
| Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
| Model | DeVille | Sequoia |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6952 cc | 5700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 288 HP | 376 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 2714 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 5210 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1955 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 3100 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 100 L |
