1967 Cadillac Eldorado vs. 1949 Hudson Commodore
To start off, 1967 Cadillac Eldorado is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Hudson Commodore. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Hudson Commodore would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Cadillac Eldorado (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 1949 Hudson Commodore. (128 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Cadillac Eldorado should accelerate faster than 1949 Hudson Commodore. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Cadillac Eldorado weights approximately 426 kg more than 1949 Hudson Commodore. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1949 Hudson Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Hudson Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1967 Cadillac Eldorado, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Cadillac Eldorado | 1949 Hudson Commodore | |
Make | Cadillac | Hudson |
Model | Eldorado | Commodore |
Year Released | 1967 | 1949 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 4166 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 128 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2082 kg | 1656 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5620 mm | 5280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1960 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 3160 mm |