1967 Cadillac Eldorado vs. 1960 Holden FC
To start off, 1967 Cadillac Eldorado is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Holden FC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Holden FC would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Cadillac Eldorado (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 146 more horse power than 1960 Holden FC. (62 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Cadillac Eldorado should accelerate faster than 1960 Holden FC. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Cadillac Eldorado weights approximately 1102 kg more than 1960 Holden FC. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1960 Holden FC is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Holden FC. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1967 Cadillac Eldorado, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Cadillac Eldorado | 1960 Holden FC | |
| Make | Cadillac | Holden |
| Model | Eldorado | FC |
| Year Released | 1967 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7029 cc | 2165 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 62 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 2082 kg | 980 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5620 mm | 4480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2670 mm |
