1967 Cadillac Eldorado vs. 1991 Mercedes-Benz C 112
To start off, 1991 Mercedes-Benz C 112 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Cadillac Eldorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Cadillac Eldorado would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Mercedes-Benz C 112 (402 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 194 more horse power than 1967 Cadillac Eldorado. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1991 Mercedes-Benz C 112 should accelerate faster than 1967 Cadillac Eldorado. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Cadillac Eldorado weights approximately 532 kg more than 1991 Mercedes-Benz C 112.
Because 1991 Mercedes-Benz C 112 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1991 Mercedes-Benz C 112. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1967 Cadillac Eldorado, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Cadillac Eldorado | 1991 Mercedes-Benz C 112 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Eldorado | C 112 |
| Year Released | 1967 | 1991 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 7029 cc | 5987 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 402 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2082 kg | 1550 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5620 mm | 4620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1210 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2710 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 100 L |
