1967 Cadillac Eldorado vs. 1996 Volvo 960

To start off, 1996 Volvo 960 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Cadillac Eldorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Cadillac Eldorado would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Cadillac Eldorado (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1996 Volvo 960. (168 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Cadillac Eldorado should accelerate faster than 1996 Volvo 960. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Cadillac Eldorado weights approximately 582 kg more than 1996 Volvo 960. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1996 Volvo 960 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Volvo 960. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1967 Cadillac Eldorado, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications: