1967 Cadillac Eldorado vs. 1998 Mazda RX-7
To start off, 1998 Mazda RX-7 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Cadillac Eldorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Cadillac Eldorado would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Mazda RX-7 (265 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 1967 Cadillac Eldorado. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Mazda RX-7 should accelerate faster than 1967 Cadillac Eldorado. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Cadillac Eldorado weights approximately 842 kg more than 1998 Mazda RX-7.
Because 1998 Mazda RX-7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 Mazda RX-7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1967 Cadillac Eldorado, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Cadillac Eldorado | 1998 Mazda RX-7 | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | Eldorado | RX-7 |
Year Released | 1967 | 1998 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 2616 cc |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 265 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2082 kg | 1240 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5620 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1240 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2430 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 76 L |