1967 Cadillac Eldorado vs. 2000 Chrysler 300
To start off, 2000 Chrysler 300 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Cadillac Eldorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Cadillac Eldorado would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chrysler 300 (253 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1967 Cadillac Eldorado. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 1967 Cadillac Eldorado. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Cadillac Eldorado weights approximately 473 kg more than 2000 Chrysler 300.
Because 2000 Chrysler 300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Chrysler 300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1967 Cadillac Eldorado, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Cadillac Eldorado | 2000 Chrysler 300 | |
Make | Cadillac | Chrysler |
Model | Eldorado | 300 |
Year Released | 1967 | 2000 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 5699 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 253 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2082 kg | 1609 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2750 mm |