1967 Cadillac Eldorado vs. 2001 Mercedes-Benz ML
To start off, 2001 Mercedes-Benz ML is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Cadillac Eldorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Cadillac Eldorado would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Mercedes-Benz ML (288 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 1967 Cadillac Eldorado. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Mercedes-Benz ML should accelerate faster than 1967 Cadillac Eldorado. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mercedes-Benz ML weights approximately 132 kg more than 1967 Cadillac Eldorado. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2001 Mercedes-Benz ML is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Cadillac Eldorado. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mercedes-Benz ML will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Cadillac Eldorado | 2001 Mercedes-Benz ML | |
Make | Cadillac | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Eldorado | ML |
Year Released | 1967 | 2001 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 4966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 288 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2082 kg | 2214 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5620 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2860 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 83 L |