1967 Cadillac Eldorado vs. 2002 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2002 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Cadillac Eldorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Cadillac Eldorado would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Cadillac Eldorado (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 2002 Land Rover Range Rover. (175 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Cadillac Eldorado should accelerate faster than 2002 Land Rover Range Rover. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 358 kg more than 1967 Cadillac Eldorado.
Because 2002 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Cadillac Eldorado. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Cadillac Eldorado | 2002 Land Rover Range Rover | |
Make | Cadillac | Land Rover |
Model | Eldorado | Range Rover |
Year Released | 1967 | 2002 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 2926 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 175 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2082 kg | 2440 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5620 mm | 4960 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 2200 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2800 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 100 L |