1967 Cadillac Eldorado vs. 2003 Ford Escape
To start off, 2003 Ford Escape is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Cadillac Eldorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Cadillac Eldorado would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Cadillac Eldorado (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 2003 Ford Escape. (128 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Cadillac Eldorado should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Escape. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Cadillac Eldorado weights approximately 606 kg more than 2003 Ford Escape. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Ford Escape is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Cadillac Eldorado. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Escape will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Cadillac Eldorado | 2003 Ford Escape | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | Eldorado | Escape |
Year Released | 1967 | 2003 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 1988 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 128 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2082 kg | 1476 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5620 mm | 4400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 59 L |