1967 Cadillac Eldorado vs. 2004 Mazda MX
To start off, 2004 Mazda MX is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Cadillac Eldorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Cadillac Eldorado would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Cadillac Eldorado (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 2004 Mazda MX. (160 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Cadillac Eldorado should accelerate faster than 2004 Mazda MX.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Cadillac Eldorado | 2004 Mazda MX | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | Eldorado | MX |
Year Released | 1967 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 2261 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Length | 5620 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2760 mm |