1967 Cadillac Eldorado vs. 2009 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2009 Ford Mustang is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Cadillac Eldorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Cadillac Eldorado would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Mustang (210 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1967 Cadillac Eldorado. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1967 Cadillac Eldorado. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Cadillac Eldorado weights approximately 911 kg more than 2009 Ford Mustang.
Because 2009 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1967 Cadillac Eldorado, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Cadillac Eldorado | 2009 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | Eldorado | Mustang |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7029 cc | 4009 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 210 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2082 kg | 1171 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5620 mm | 4770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2730 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 61 L |
