1967 Cadillac Eldorado vs. 2010 Mazda 6
To start off, 2010 Mazda 6 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Cadillac Eldorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Cadillac Eldorado would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Cadillac Eldorado (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 2010 Mazda 6. (118 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Cadillac Eldorado should accelerate faster than 2010 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Cadillac Eldorado weights approximately 672 kg more than 2010 Mazda 6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Cadillac Eldorado | 2010 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | Eldorado | 6 |
Year Released | 1967 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 1798 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2082 kg | 1410 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5620 mm | 4755 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1795 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2789 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 70 L |