1967 Cadillac Eldorado vs. 2010 Suzuki Kizashi
To start off, 2010 Suzuki Kizashi is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Cadillac Eldorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Cadillac Eldorado would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Cadillac Eldorado (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 2010 Suzuki Kizashi. (180 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Cadillac Eldorado should accelerate faster than 2010 Suzuki Kizashi. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Cadillac Eldorado weights approximately 572 kg more than 2010 Suzuki Kizashi. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Cadillac Eldorado | 2010 Suzuki Kizashi | |
Make | Cadillac | Suzuki |
Model | Eldorado | Kizashi |
Year Released | 1967 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 180 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2082 kg | 1510 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5620 mm | 4651 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1821 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1481 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 63 L |