1967 Cadillac Eldorado vs. 2013 Honda Ridgeline
To start off, 2013 Honda Ridgeline is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Cadillac Eldorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Cadillac Eldorado would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Honda Ridgeline (247 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 1967 Cadillac Eldorado. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Honda Ridgeline should accelerate faster than 1967 Cadillac Eldorado. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Cadillac Eldorado weights approximately 35 kg more than 2013 Honda Ridgeline.
Because 2013 Honda Ridgeline is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Cadillac Eldorado. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Honda Ridgeline will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Cadillac Eldorado | 2013 Honda Ridgeline | |
| Make | Cadillac | Honda |
| Model | Eldorado | Ridgeline |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7029 cc | 3471 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 247 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | AWD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2082 kg | 2047 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5620 mm | 5255 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1976 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1786 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 3100 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 83 L |
