1967 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1955 Fiat Campagnola
To start off, 1967 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Fiat Campagnola. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Fiat Campagnola would be higher. At 5,354 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Chevrolet Camaro (276 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 224 more horse power than 1955 Fiat Campagnola. (52 HP @ 3700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1955 Fiat Campagnola. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 65 kg more than 1955 Fiat Campagnola. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1955 Fiat Campagnola is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1955 Fiat Campagnola will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Chevrolet Camaro | 1955 Fiat Campagnola | |
Make | Chevrolet | Fiat |
Model | Camaro | Campagnola |
Year Released | 1967 | 1955 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5354 cc | 1901 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 276 HP | 52 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 3700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1315 kg | 1250 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 3650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2260 mm |