1967 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1956 Saab 92B
To start off, 1967 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Saab 92B. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Saab 92B would be higher. At 5,749 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1967 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1956 Saab 92B, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Chevrolet Camaro | 1956 Saab 92B | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Saab |
| Model | Camaro | 92B |
| Year Released | 1967 | 1956 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
| Engine Size | 5749 cc | 763 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 3960 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2480 mm |
