1967 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1958 Fiat Campagnola
To start off, 1967 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Fiat Campagnola. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Fiat Campagnola would be higher. At 5,749 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1958 Fiat Campagnola is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1958 Fiat Campagnola will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Chevrolet Camaro | 1958 Fiat Campagnola | |
Make | Chevrolet | Fiat |
Model | Camaro | Campagnola |
Year Released | 1967 | 1958 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5749 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 38 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 3650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2260 mm |