1967 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1963 Mazda R 360
To start off, 1967 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Mazda R 360. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Mazda R 360 would be higher. At 4,958 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Chevrolet Camaro (290 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 274 more horse power than 1963 Mazda R 360. (16 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1963 Mazda R 360.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Chevrolet Camaro (393 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 370 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Mazda R 360. (23 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1967 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Mazda R 360.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Chevrolet Camaro | 1963 Mazda R 360 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Camaro | R 360 |
Year Released | 1967 | 1963 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Size | 4958 cc | 356 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 290 HP | 16 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 393 Nm | 23 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 101.7 mm | 60 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.3 mm | 63 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 2990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1300 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 1770 mm |