1967 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1963 Zastava 1300
To start off, 1967 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 4,958 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Chevrolet Camaro (290 HP) has 237 more horse power than 1963 Zastava 1300. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1963 Zastava 1300.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Chevrolet Camaro (393 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 300 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Zastava 1300. (93 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1967 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Zastava 1300.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Chevrolet Camaro | 1963 Zastava 1300 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Zastava |
Model | Camaro | 1300 |
Year Released | 1967 | 1963 |
Engine Size | 4958 cc | 1295 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 290 HP | 53 HP |
Torque | 393 Nm | 93 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2430 mm |